Closed roomrys closed 1 year ago
Merging #1396 (fd084af) into develop (fb61b6c) will increase coverage by
0.17%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1396 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 72.78% 72.95% +0.17%
===========================================
Files 133 133
Lines 23718 23726 +8
===========================================
+ Hits 17263 17310 +47
+ Misses 6455 6416 -39
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
sleap/nn/training.py | 75.79% <ø> (ø) |
|
sleap/nn/evals.py | 92.46% <100.00%> (+17.46%) |
:arrow_up: |
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Description
Multiple people have asked if there might be a way to link back to frames where the model has performed poorly on as a way of either determining whether a certain video is culprit or mislabeled instances are culprit. This PR specifically follows the code provided by @adam-matic in #1253.
While this PR does not tie distances to the instances like a Dataframe might accomplish, it returns the instances (in a dictionary) in the same order as the distances. Feel free to suggest improvements!
Types of changes
Does this address any currently open issues?
1253
Outside contributors checklist
Thank you for contributing to SLEAP!
:heart: