(3c -> 3b) Add method to test instance grouping

roomrys commented 1 year ago

Description

This PR adds a method to test and retrieve the "correct" instance grouping. Here "correct" means the instance grouping with the lowest total reprojection error across all frames.

Types of changes

[ ] Bugfix
[x] New feature
[ ] Refactor / Code style update (no logical changes)
[ ] Build / CI changes
[ ] Documentation Update
[ ] Other (explain)

Does this address any currently open issues?

[list open issues here]

Outside contributors checklist

[ ] Review the guidelines for contributing to this repository
[ ] Read and sign the CLA and add yourself to the authors list
[ ] Make sure you are making a pull request against the develop branch (not main). Also you should start your branch off develop
[ ] Add tests that prove your fix is effective or that your feature works
[ ] Add necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Thank you for contributing to SLEAP!

:heart:

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Introduced new methods for grouping instances and calculating reprojection error in the GUI.
Tests
- Added tests to ensure the accuracy and reliability of new triangulation and reprojection functionalities.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 year ago

Walkthrough

The update introduces modifications to the sleap/gui/commands.py file, including the import of permutations from itertools and refactoring of the TriangulateSession class to enhance the handling of instances and their coordinates. The corresponding test file, tests/gui/test_commands.py, has been updated to accommodate these changes.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
`sleap/gui/commands.py`	Importing `permutations` from `itertools` and refactoring the `TriangulateSession` class to improve instance and coordinate handling.
`tests/gui/test_commands.py`	Updated test function signatures and references to match the changes in `sleap/gui/commands.py`.

Poem

Among the code, a rabbit hops, 🐇
Refactoring with gentle bops.
Tests embrace the shifting ground,
In logic's dance, new solutions found. 💻

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit: - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit-tests for this file.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - The JSON schema for the configuration file is available [here](https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json). - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json` ### CodeRabbit Discord Community Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback.

roomrys commented 1 year ago

@coderabbitai review

codecov[bot] commented 12 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: 12 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (8ff1cc5) 73.83% compared to head (ed27d88) 73.81%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
sleap/gui/commands.py	84.81%	12 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## liezl/add-method-to-get-single-instance-permutations #1599 +/- ## ======================================================================================== - Coverage 73.83% 73.81% -0.02% ======================================================================================== Files 135 135 Lines 24579 24636 +57 ======================================================================================== + Hits 18147 18185 +38 - Misses 6432 6451 +19 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

talmolab / sleap