Hi,
I tested ALLHiC and SALSA2 with a diploid genome assembly(19 + XY) that is built from linked-reads (Pseudohap 1 style) and shows around 35kb of contig N50. and I found that the outputs are way different in scaffold N50, 142.13 Mbp (from K = 22) and 35.56 Mbp, respectivly. Even reference's is 140.99 Mbp.
What else can I check for the comparison except for the contiguity? That's because it's not reasonable to think on the contiguity for the comparison of the two tools.
Do you have any ideas on what make this huge differences? It's so different in the result stats that I am confused.
Hi, I tested ALLHiC and SALSA2 with a diploid genome assembly(19 + XY) that is built from linked-reads (Pseudohap 1 style) and shows around 35kb of contig N50. and I found that the outputs are way different in scaffold N50, 142.13 Mbp (from K = 22) and 35.56 Mbp, respectivly. Even reference's is 140.99 Mbp.
Thank you.