Open nvkelso opened 7 years ago
16/53.1361/-1.3461
bike_tier1_off_road_filter:
any:
- { is_bicycle_related: true, kind_detail: [cycleway, path, pedestrian, steps, bridleway, raceway, corridor] }
+ - kind_detail: [bridleway]
- cycleway: [sidepath, track, opposite_track, buffered_lane]
- cycleway_left: [sidepath, track, opposite_track, buffered_lane]
- cycleway_right: [sidepath, track, opposite_track, buffered_lane]
@@ -697,7 +742,7 @@ global:
# brown
bike_tier1_off_road_track_filter:
all:
- - { is_bicycle_related: true, kind_detail: [track, footway] }
+ - { is_bicycle_related: true, kind_detail: [track, footway, bridleway] }
Hi. I was probably the user in question, just spent yesterday playing around with styles, wish I'd seen this earlier. Code fixes it well for bikes, though if its a path and not a track it would be good to be a single brown line but not essential.
Maybe needs a new issue but with the path overlay I have a couple of issues. The first image shows a track with foot = yes but it shows the same as tracks around it that don't have a foot value. So private tracks look the same.
The second image is back to bridleways, even though foot = yes and its even is a walking_network it does not render anything.
I'll have a quick play with it but not getting to grips with yaml yet.
Craig
A user in United Kingdom reports we can improve our bike map this way by adding bridleways to the general okay to ride bikes category. I propose adding it to the brown "tracks" section.