tanjiajiajun / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Long tag disables scrolling #10

Open tanjiajiajun opened 2 months ago

tanjiajiajun commented 2 months ago

Screenshot 2024-04-19 at 5.03.59 PM.png

When tag is too big and overflows, scrolling of the name cards is not allowed, and all information is displayed in a bigger card. I dont think this inconsistency is documented, so ill just put it here. For examplem, address is cut off in the example below as the line is too long and scrolling is disabled

soc-pe-bot commented 2 months ago

Team's Response

Same error as described in the first issue encountered.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Long tag name not accounted for

Screenshot 2024-04-19 at 5.00.36 PM.png

In the case of long tag names, i Cannot see the full tag, even if i scroll


[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#83] [original labels: type.FunctionalityBug severity.VeryLow]

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

image.png

The tag can support up to 40 to 50 characters, given tags are not meant to be many words.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

Reason for disagreement: For this bug, originally the user card is scrollable, but the long tag disables scrolling. For example, address is cut off in the example below as the line is too long and scrolling is disabled, so there is no way to see the whole address.

This is differnet from the other bug where long tags cuts off and does not allow the user to see the full tag.


## :question: Issue response Team chose [`response.NotInScope`] - [x] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** This is unintentional behavior, and a bug because as a user of the app, I can no longer scroll to find key information about my friends i stored in this app.
## :question: Issue type Team chose [`type.FunctionalityBug`] Originally [`type.FeatureFlaw`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]