soc-se-bot
commented
1 year ago Team's Response
User Guide has mentioned that to view the full version, users can run card view. This rationale behind this design is because we anticipated that card list will have so many cards and that it will clutter the view if all 100 cards have longs questions and answers, hence we truncate them. Furthermore, the message in the terminal also clearly says that it has been truncated
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: Saying that it is truncated in the app does not mean it is a not a feature flaw. An application for studying should at the very least fulfill basic needs of the students and take in a question of reasonable length. Given the context of exams today, 50 characters is definitely to little.
I think that in the pursuit of visual clarity, the team forgot about why they had the feature in the first place.
## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.Low`] Originally [`severity.Medium`] - [x] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** Directly impacts user experience, this is quite a big oversight in my opinion.
The application truncates questions the user wishes to enter. However, this is in detriment to users who wish to input longer questions. Many questions in examinations are longer than 50 characters.