Closed mbossenbroek closed 10 years ago
Hi Matt,
Had a little time tonight - came up with this: https://github.com/ptaoussanis/nippy/blob/dev/src/taoensso/nippy/utils.clj#L178
Feedback welcome.
Cheers! :-)
Okay, included with 2.6.0-alpha4
. Seems to be working reasonable well, though it's difficult to test the negative case besides just enumerating the handful of known unfreezables (atoms, fns, etc.).
Closing, but you're welcome to reopen if something comes up.
Thanks! I'll play around with this today & let you know if I find anything.
Thanks, Matt
On Sunday, February 16, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
Okay, included with 2.6.0-alpha4. Seems to be working reasonable well, though it's difficult to test the negative case besides just enumerating the handful of known unfreezables (atoms, fns, etc.). Closing, but you're welcome to reopen if something comes up.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/ptaoussanis/nippy/issues/39#issuecomment-35195255).
Hi Matt,
I'd like to cut an RC1 release soon - any trouble with this or other changes in 2.6?
No problems so far. I haven't done a lot with freezable? - that was more for an experimental idea I was playing with. I played around with it, but I haven't been hammering it.
The other stuff I've been using heavily with no problems.
-Matt
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
Hi Matt, I'd like to cut an RC1 release soon - any trouble with this or other changes in 2.6?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/ptaoussanis/nippy/issues/39#issuecomment-37300816).
Okay, great - appreciate the quick feedback :-)
Got around to playing with this again today & noticed that in the main ns, you used freezeable? (extra e).
-Matt
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
Okay, great - appreciate the quick feedback :-)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/ptaoussanis/nippy/issues/39#issuecomment-37316957).
Ahh, thanks! Just pushed a fix to dev
.
I'd like a function that would return whether or not a value is able to be frozen and thawed by nippy. This prevents having to attempt the serialization and catch any exceptions. It can also return the proper value for Clojure functions, which appear to be serializable, but won't work in a different REPL without AOT.
=> (taoensso.nippy/freezeable? 0) true
=> (taoensso.nippy/freezeable? (atom 0)) false
=> (taoensso.nippy/freezeable? (fn [x] x)) false
Thanks, Matt