Closed yinheli closed 6 months ago
Hi @huskar-t I wanted to gently follow up on this PR. Would you have some time to review it when you get a chance?
Also, I've been contemplating on the classification of this PR, would it be more fitting to categorize it as an enhancement or a bug fix? I'd appreciate your insights on this.
Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000%
with 12 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 79.15%. Comparing base (
cff3f5e
) to head (c7c8d2e
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
taosWS/connection.go | 40.00% | 3 Missing and 3 partials :warning: |
taosWS/statement.go | 0.00% | 3 Missing and 3 partials :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@menshibin please help review
taosConn add atomic closed flag to prevent panic issues in concurrent scenarios issue: #228