Continuing the same evolution of the code. Method missing can also be used to set custom fields by checking for the = at the end of the method. For this pull request, it only checks for setting the value of existing fields.
Unfortunately, it is more code that I would like because of the parsing and converting of the method name to a field. More to come as this won't work for fields that weren't set before as the conversion of a method name to a field name won't work until the field name is known. The field name won't be known when it isn't read yet (e.g. when creating a new person). So, the next pull request will solve that problem.
Continuing the same evolution of the code. Method missing can also be used to set custom fields by checking for the = at the end of the method. For this pull request, it only checks for setting the value of existing fields.
Unfortunately, it is more code that I would like because of the parsing and converting of the method name to a field. More to come as this won't work for fields that weren't set before as the conversion of a method name to a field name won't work until the field name is known. The field name won't be known when it isn't read yet (e.g. when creating a new person). So, the next pull request will solve that problem.