Named definitions

[AlexeyPoldeo]

It will be great to add optional name parameter on registering and getting an object

[JulianBissekkou]

so you are able to get the dependency with that name later on? What is your use case for this feature?

[AlexeyPoldeo]

Yes. Sometimes it's required to inject objects of same class, but different purposes. Like username and password - both are String.

[stefanschaller]

Okay, we will do it. But you need always the type info. So it will looks like this:

injector.registerDependency<UserService>(dependencyName: "UserService2", (injector) => UserServiceImpl())..

and you get your dependency like this:

injector.getDependency<UserService>(dependencyName: "UserService2");

Are you fine with that?

[stefanschaller]

In version 1.0.5 we added support for named dependencies

[AlexeyPoldeo]

But this is not reflected in Readme...