Closed Sumit112192 closed 3 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 77.54011%
with 42 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 69.48%. Comparing base (
0df98ce
) to head (263140c
). Report is 3 commits behind head on master.:exclamation: Current head 263140c differs from pull request most recent head 79420d6
Please upload reports for the commit 79420d6 to get more accurate results.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:pencil: Description
Type: :roller_coaster:
infrastructure
This PR combines PR #2680 and PR #2672 to see if the numba overload function works in TARDIS.Post1) https://numba.discourse.group/t/passing-config-variables-to-functions-so-they-behave-as-compile-time-constants/2619/6 Post2)https://numba.discourse.group/t/how-to-avoid-multiple-overload-functions-for-the-same-config-variable/2625
Question on Stack overflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78675748/passing-config-variables-to-functions-so-they-behave-as-compile-time-constants/78680194?noredirect=1#comment138734245_78680194