Add benchmark documentation

[officialasishkumar]

:pencil: Description

Type:: :rocket: feature

Added benchmarks documentation

:pushpin: Resources

Examples, notebooks, and links to useful references.

:vertical_traffic_light: Testing

How did you test these changes?

• [ ] Testing pipeline
• [ ] Other method (describe)
• [ ] My changes can't be tested (explain why)

:ballot_box_with_check: Checklist

• [ ] I requested two reviewers for this pull request
• [ ] I updated the documentation according to my changes
• [ ] I built the documentation by applying the build_docs label

Note: If you are not allowed to perform any of these actions, ping (@) a contributor.

[review-notebook-app[bot]]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop* Hi human, I ran ruff on the latest commit (94e22fcf44d324d4dbea75997e80c84bfe1abc7d). Here are the outputs produced. Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here. Summarised output:

```diff ```

Complete output(might be large):

```diff ```

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 69.30%. Comparing base (186a8fb) to head (94e22fc). Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #2763 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 69.82% 69.30% -0.53% ========================================== Files 191 192 +1 Lines 15021 15048 +27 ========================================== - Hits 10489 10429 -60 - Misses 4532 4619 +87 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*

Hi, human.

The docs workflow has succeeded :heavy_check_mark:

Click here to see your results.