Closed Sumit112192 closed 3 months ago
Check out this pull request on
See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
*beep* *bop* Hi human, I ran ruff on the latest commit (81dffe9965a8cdd76efc7f25958fe3244118c188). Here are the outputs produced. Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here. Summarised output:
Complete output(might be large):
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 69.68%. Comparing base (
67c9cea
) to head (81dffe9
). Report is 13 commits behind head on master.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Not much changed in the file, just some class renaming and added the new attributes.
*beep* *bop*
Hi, human.
The docs
workflow has succeeded :heavy_check_mark:
Click here to see your results.
*beep* *bop* Hi human, I ran benchmarks as you asked comparing master (67c9cea39c79f101b278b9fa7117aa8c6cf6ab13) and the latest commit (81dffe9965a8cdd76efc7f25958fe3244118c188). Here are the logs produced by ASV. Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.
Significantly changed benchmarks:
All benchmarks:
If you want to see the graph of the results, you can check it here
Make sure you commit the notebook without outputs.
Make sure you commit the notebook without outputs.
done
Do you know why the docs aren't building?
Do you know why the docs aren't building?
Due to the meta data of the notebook, right? It was discussed that this will be fixed in the workflows.
:pencil: Description
Type: :memo:
documentation
Many things in the RPacketTracker were outdated, so I updated those and also added the
boundary_interaction
part.Things to add: Generate a diff version of what has changed, and comment it. Edit*: It is already generated by github workflows https://app.reviewnb.com/tardis-sn/tardis/pull/2795/