Open Rodot- opened 4 weeks ago
Check out this pull request on
See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
*beep* *bop* Hi human, I ran ruff on the latest commit (5cb44b86c24065522c2e9e3d65f5e6ec3da07c4c). Here are the outputs produced. Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here. Summarised output:
Complete output(might be large):
Attention: Patch coverage is 4.89510%
with 408 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 67.61%. Comparing base (
92df2cf
) to head (5cb44b8
). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
*beep* *bop* Hi human, I ran benchmarks as you asked comparing master (714cffc8dd478b3db3bc6601bb205130b331b7f6) and the latest commit (5cb44b86c24065522c2e9e3d65f5e6ec3da07c4c). Here are the logs produced by ASV. Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.
Significantly changed benchmarks:
All benchmarks:
If you want to see the graph of the results, you can check it here
:pencil:
Fixes the formal integral to handle changes in geometry
Type: :beetle:
bugfix
When the formal integral is run with the v_inner solver, if the final active geometry state is different than that of the initial geometry mismatches in plasma and opacity quantities occur. This PR rectifies this by slicing these arrays to the correct size
Depends on PR #2797
:vertical_traffic_light: Testing
How did you test these changes?
CUDA version of the formal integral was tested locally
:ballot_box_with_check: Checklist
build_docs
label