Closed atharva-2001 closed 1 month ago
*beep* *bop* Hi human, I ran ruff on the latest commit (f251c2f94c90b3c915b50a3e3bb6387dad1f2f20). Here are the outputs produced. Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here. Summarised output:
Complete output(might be large):
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 70.70%. Comparing base (
81ec6e8
) to head (f251c2f
). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This is definitely the only regression data file required for these actions?
*beep* *bop* Hi human, I ran benchmarks as you asked comparing master (81ec6e8eccfacc831c386a2061ffd2d0c570e739) and the latest commit (f251c2f94c90b3c915b50a3e3bb6387dad1f2f20). Here are the logs produced by ASV. Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.
Significantly changed benchmarks:
All benchmarks:
If you want to see the graph of the results, you can check it here
This is definitely the only regression data file required for these actions?
Yes I think so. I tested these changes in these workflows- https://github.com/atharva-2001/tardis/actions/runs/11404461289/job/31733676574 https://github.com/atharva-2001/tardis/actions/runs/11404461295/job/31733676858
:pencil: Description
Type: :beetle:
bugfix
| :rocket:feature
| :biohazard:breaking change
| :vertical_traffic_light:testing
| :memo:documentation
| :roller_coaster:infrastructure
The setup_lfs action uses the entire regression data repo, even though it is cached. Downloading the atom data file might consume fewer resources and prevent the LFS bandwidth from being used too much.
:pushpin: Resources
Examples, notebooks, and links to useful references.
:vertical_traffic_light: Testing
How did you test these changes?
:ballot_box_with_check: Checklist
build_docs
label