Open andrewfullard opened 1 month ago
Check out this pull request on
See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
*beep* *bop* Hi human, I ran ruff on the latest commit (4bd4206c61714e81e948ff59c3e37c3c5568b16b). Here are the outputs produced. Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here. Summarised output:
Complete output(might be large):
*beep* *bop* Hi human, I ran benchmarks as you asked comparing master (a1f621f6d909cbc6e54a220d16648ce2548fab6d) and the latest commit (4bd4206c61714e81e948ff59c3e37c3c5568b16b). Here are the logs produced by ASV. Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.
Significantly changed benchmarks:
All benchmarks:
If you want to see the graph of the results, you can check it here
Attention: Patch coverage is 95.58824%
with 6 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 70.18%. Comparing base (
a1f621f
) to head (4bd4206
). Report is 5 commits behind head on master.
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
tardis/io/atom_data/base.py | 78.94% | 4 Missing :warning: |
...rdis/plasma/equilibrium/rates/collisional_rates.py | 80.00% | 2 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
🚨 Try these New Features:
adding more tests to get coverage up probably
Note to self: make sure the tests pull the extra atom data file from the regression data repo
:pencil: Description
Type: :rocket:
feature
Initial plans for replacing the old "NLTE" setup with a hopefully cleaner structure.
:vertical_traffic_light: Testing
How did you test these changes?
:ballot_box_with_check: Checklist
build_docs
label