results

[michield]

I've ran it quite a few times on my local machine now, with generally similar results:

NDB 2.2 | Time: 1.950 s | Memory: 14.0 MB | PHP: 5.5.3-1ubuntu2.3 | Nette: 2.2.x NotOrm | Time: 8.290 s | Memory: 7.3 MB | PHP: 5.5.3-1ubuntu2.3 PDO | Time: 0.089 s | Memory: 0.3 MB | PHP: 5.5.3-1ubuntu2.3 FluentPDO | Time: 0.721 s | Memory: 5.4 MB | PHP: 5.5.3-1ubuntu2.3 LeanMapper | Time: 1.668 s | Memory: 15.9 MB | PHP: 5.5.3-1ubuntu2.3 Doctrine2 | Time: 10.326 s | Memory: 27.4 MB | PHP: 5.5.3-1ubuntu2.3 | Doctrine: 2.4.2

[tarekdj]

FluentPDO seems to be better than NotOrm. But it still far from PDO.

[michield]

yes of these lot, apart from PDO, FluentPDO comes out best

[tarekdj]

added support for harp-orm lib. Bench results (Win7 OS):

NDB 2.2 | Time: 3.264 s | Memory: 8.5 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 | Nette: 2.2.x NotOrm | Time: 17.354 s | Memory: 7.1 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 PDO | Time: 0.299 s | Memory: 0.3 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 FluentPDO | Time: 1.341 s | Memory: 4.6 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 Harp-orm | Time: 1.719 s | Memory: 0.7 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 LeanMapper | Time: 3.326 s | Memory: 9.5 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 Doctrine2 | Time: 31.366 s | Memory: 19.4 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 | Doctrine: 2.4.2

[tarekdj]

Results after adding Pixie library:

NDB 2.2 | Time: 3.234 s | Memory: 8.5 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 | Nette: 2.2.x NotOrm | Time: 17.173 s | Memory: 7.1 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 PDO | Time: 0.302 s | Memory: 0.3 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 FluentPDO | Time: 1.282 s | Memory: 4.6 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 Harp-orm | Time: 1.646 s | Memory: 0.7 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 Pixie | Time: 1.596 s | Memory: 1.0 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 LeanMapper | Time: 3.304 s | Memory: 9.5 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 Doctrine2 | Time: 31.494 s | Memory: 19.4 MB | PHP: 5.4.15 | Doctrine: 2.4.2

[michield]

the Harp-orm is interesting. Very low memory use.

it will be good to compare a list of things they provide, once we have a shortlist.

[tarekdj]

@michield take a look at the Pixie library