tarekmed / gbif-ecat

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/gbif-ecat
0 stars 0 forks source link

What to do with nub synonyms with unknown accepted? #86

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
There are synonyms in the nub that have an unknown accepted name. For example 
Leptura nigrella Craighead, 1923 is a synonym coming from IRMNG with no 
accepted name. 
http://ecat-dev.gbif.org/usage/100649767

Right now all those synonyms are linked to the Incertae Sedis kingdom - do we 
want this?
Should we better ignore all those names?
Or create new placeholder usages for each unknown accepted?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by wixner@gmail.com on 4 Jan 2012 at 9:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
why dont we treat unattached synonyms as basically a provisional 'accepted 
name' in the sense that it's hung from the nub hierarchy as a terminal 'taxon'

Original comment by dprem...@gmail.com on 4 Jan 2012 at 10:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
good idea.
We can assign the "Doubtful" accepted status to such names and link them into 
the hierarchy.
Will implement this approach

Original comment by wixner@gmail.com on 4 Jan 2012 at 10:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Fixed in r4801  according to above approach.
See NubGenerratorIT integration test, section starting with 

    // CHECKLIST 122 tests - incertae sedis synonym

Original comment by wixner@gmail.com on 4 Jan 2012 at 1:52