Thank you for the great theme. I am enjoying creating a documentation website with it!
I noticed that the Develop and Master branches don't really make sense right now (Network Graph).
Specifically, the Develop branch is missing a few commits from Master (one of those commits is actually duplicated in both branches, at different times, and different authors).
I propose adopting the popular branching model: Gitflow; I also think using verioning will help advance the project.
To do this, we should:
1) Merge Master into Develop
2) Merge contributions via pull request only to Develop
3) When ready, merge Develop into Master and bump the version number.
The reason why I made this issue is that I am not really sure what branch is more complete....they both seem to have small differences that should be included in both branches.
Take a look at my Develop fork with the current Master merged in.
Thank you for the great theme. I am enjoying creating a documentation website with it!
I noticed that the Develop and Master branches don't really make sense right now (Network Graph).
Specifically, the Develop branch is missing a few commits from Master (one of those commits is actually duplicated in both branches, at different times, and different authors).
I propose adopting the popular branching model: Gitflow; I also think using verioning will help advance the project.
To do this, we should: 1) Merge Master into Develop 2) Merge contributions via pull request only to Develop 3) When ready, merge Develop into Master and bump the version number.
The reason why I made this issue is that I am not really sure what branch is more complete....they both seem to have small differences that should be included in both branches.
Take a look at my Develop fork with the current Master merged in.
Any thoughts?