search

tari-project / rfcs

RFC documents for the Tari protocol
3 stars 18 forks source link

Formalise date format #47

Closed SWvheerden closed 8 months ago

SWvheerden commented 2 years ago

It looks like the RFC's use a multitude of different date formats. I have spotted: MMDDYY, DDMMYY, DD Month YY etc. We need to pick one and update all dates to the specified one

SWvheerden commented 2 years ago

My vote would be for DDMMYY

stringhandler commented 2 years ago

Mine would be for long format or sortable DD MMM YYYY, or YYYY-MM-DD

SWvheerden commented 2 years ago

Perhaps a long format is better, MMDD and DDMM can cause some confusion.

delta1 commented 2 years ago

ISO 8601 or death

AaronFeickert commented 1 year ago

ISO 8601 or death

Yeah, I'd say go with ISO-8601. It's standardized, good for sorting, and pretty unambiguous.

CjS77 commented 8 months ago

Looks like we've organically converged on dd MMM yyyy