Closed SWvheerden closed 1 month ago
3 files 120 suites 43m 7s :stopwatch: 1 295 tests 1 295 :white_check_mark: 0 :zzz: 0 :x: 3 877 runs 3 877 :white_check_mark: 0 :zzz: 0 :x:
Results for commit 2d4a9b24.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
2 files + 2 11 suites +11 15m 45s :stopwatch: + 15m 45s 35 tests +35 34 :white_check_mark: +34 0 :zzz: ±0 1 :x: +1 36 runs +36 35 :white_check_mark: +35 0 :zzz: ±0 1 :x: +1
For more details on these failures, see this check.
Results for commit 2d4a9b24. ± Comparison against base commit 43b2317e.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
This test still fails:
All 3 runs failed: Scenario: Verify gprc cna create block with more than 1 coinbase:
Step panicked. Captured output: called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: InvalidSize
Scenario: Verify gprc cna create block with more than 1 coinbase
✔ Given I have a seed node SEED_A
✔ When I have 1 base nodes connected to all seed nodes
✘ Then generate a block with 2 coinbases from node SEED_A
This test still fails:
All 3 runs failed: Scenario: Verify gprc cna create block with more than 1 coinbase:
Step panicked. Captured output: called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: InvalidSize Scenario: Verify gprc cna create block with more than 1 coinbase ✔ Given I have a seed node SEED_A ✔ When I have 1 base nodes connected to all seed nodes ✘ Then generate a block with 2 coinbases from node SEED_A
A bit jumping the gun here, but its fixed now😀
Description
fixes integration tests due to regression bug