Closed Leonidas-from-XIV closed 2 years ago
Could you squash the is_conf
change and remove the description of the conf
change in the commit message?
Also, could you add a test with a non-empty flag? Thanks!
@gridbugs Can you take a look again? I've done some renaming and while thinking about it realized that even to me it was unclear what constituted a "base" package. With the compiler gone from the list it turns out that these are mostly build systems and dependencies of oasis
(that aren't much used outside of it) so I explained the reasoning for them.
This changes the logic from hardcoding the compiler "base packages" to instead read the OPAM flags to check whether the package in question is a compiler in which case it will be considered a base package.
It also adds code to check for packages whether they are
conf
packages, which could be used to check for virtual packages.Inspired by #327, this would allow
dkml-base-compiler
to be considered a base package and not accidentally vendor it. However it doesn't yet allow using the DKML compiler, because the name of theocaml
conf package is still hardcoded with no way to override it (yet).