Upon feedback from multiple users and thinking more about the tradeoffs I now think this is preferrable. Let's make this a new default: re-execute failures even if they seem to be unaffected by changes. Of course the affected tests will be still prioritized, but the failures are going to be re-executed afterwards.
@bencaine-integral @javiertejero
Any comment please @blueyed or anybody else?
Upon feedback from multiple users and thinking more about the tradeoffs I now think this is preferrable. Let's make this a new default: re-execute failures even if they seem to be unaffected by changes. Of course the affected tests will be still prioritized, but the failures are going to be re-executed afterwards.
@bencaine-integral @javiertejero Any comment please @blueyed or anybody else?