Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Yes, I've been wondering what to do about that. According to various sources,
we should put the next version of the artifact, followed by -SNAPSHOT, and
that's what the release plugin does too:
http://maven.apache.org/maven-release/maven-release-plugin/examples/prepare-rele
ase.html
But what do I know what the next version will be? The project isn't all that
"managed" at this point in time. Does it really make sense to use the old
version number followed by SNAPSHOT? I'm not sure. So I just leave it alone for
now :)
Original comment by samuel.a...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2013 at 1:46
If you don't want to make up a new version, I'd suggest just using the old
version name with -SNAPSHOT or just make it javacpp-0.6.1-SNAPSHOT. I think the
trade-off between giving users erroneous behavior and using a possibly wrong
version number is well worth it.
Many projects have changed their revision numbering scheme at some point.
Original comment by Florian....@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2013 at 2:05
If we use an old version with -SNAPSHOT, then some users would confuse that
with older code, but on the other hand, if we bump the version, and that
version never makes it to a stable version without -SNAPSHOT, then that's also
confusing... Maybe adding some other qualifier could work, like
0.6-???-SNAPSHOT, where by most user would understand this is newer than 0.6.
Let me know if you think of anything meaningful, thanks!
Original comment by samuel.a...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2013 at 2:15
I've thought about it and it doesn't seem to cause problems to bump the version
up and append -SNAPSHOT, because we're going to release that version eventually
anyway. And if we need a x.x.1 bug fix release or something, that can be done
in another branch independent of the master branch, after the facts, so it
shouldn't cause any problems. Git seems to follow a different pattern, so
that's confusing, but I guess everyone is used to the inconsistencies by now,
so I'll make sure to be consistently inconsistent from now on :)
Original comment by samuel.a...@gmail.com
on 8 Jan 2014 at 1:23
I've started to use the -SNAPSHOT version qualifier and everything seems to be
going well :) Thanks for the input!
Original comment by samuel.a...@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2014 at 3:35
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Florian....@gmail.com
on 16 Dec 2013 at 5:36