Open zanettea opened 12 years ago
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:06 PM, zanettea reply@reply.github.com wrote:
I would suggest to allow redefining efficiency when allocating resources to tasks. If fact the efficiency of a resource can vary depending on the kind of task he has to accomplish.
Something like this:
task "Easy for John, hard for Mark" { allocate Mark { efficiency 0.5 } allocate John { efficiency 1.0 } }
Are you aware the allocate can take a list of resources?
allocate Mark { alternative John, Joe, Jim efficiency 0.5 }
This is probably not what you want.
Chris
In fact is not what I want.
Arrigo
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Chris Schlaeger reply@reply.github.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:06 PM, zanettea reply@reply.github.com wrote:
I would suggest to allow redefining efficiency when allocating resources to tasks. If fact the efficiency of a resource can vary depending on the kind of task he has to accomplish.
Something like this:
task "Easy for John, hard for Mark" { allocate Mark { efficiency 0.5 } allocate John { efficiency 1.0 } }
Are you aware the allocate can take a list of resources?
allocate Mark { alternative John, Joe, Jim efficiency 0.5 }
This is probably not what you want.
Chris
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/taskjuggler/TaskJuggler/issues/27#issuecomment-3149321
I see that this hasn't been discussed much, yet I would also need this feature :+1:
Could purge be used here and then redefine the efficiency for these resources?
I think that I tried what you suggest @jostber, but it didn't work out
I would suggest to allow redefining efficiency when allocating resources to tasks. If fact the efficiency of a resource can vary depending on the kind of task he has to accomplish.
Something like this:
task "Easy for John, hard for Mark" { allocate Mark { efficiency 0.5 } allocate John { efficiency 1.0 } }
Best, Arrigo