tasoc / photometry

The TASOC Photometry Pipeline
https://tasoc.dk
GNU General Public License v3.0
18 stars 4 forks source link

Faster cadences (20s TPF and 10min FFI) #30

Closed rhandberg closed 3 years ago

rhandberg commented 3 years ago

Work on accommodating faster observation cadences after sector 27.

Will also involve major updates to the testing-data, since we should now include 20s data and faster FFI as a test-case.

This will also change the output folder structure, to avoid clashes between TPF files with different cadence.

codecov[bot] commented 3 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #30 (39ee2a7) into devel (5ea8609) will decrease coverage by 0.16%. The diff coverage is 81.50%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel      #30      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.64%   84.48%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        4260     4324      +64     
==========================================
+ Hits         3606     3653      +47     
- Misses        654      671      +17     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
photometry/prepare.py 85.14% <60.00%> (-2.76%) :arrow_down:
photometry/todolist.py 84.56% <60.86%> (-1.41%) :arrow_down:
photometry/taskmanager.py 93.33% <86.36%> (-0.87%) :arrow_down:
photometry/utilities.py 95.51% <96.15%> (+1.39%) :arrow_up:
photometry/BasePhotometry.py 94.01% <100.00%> (+0.14%) :arrow_up:
run_make_todo.py 90.90% <100.00%> (+0.28%) :arrow_up:
run_prepare_photometry.py 90.90% <100.00%> (+0.28%) :arrow_up:
run_tessphot.py 87.17% <100.00%> (+0.16%) :arrow_up:
run_tessphot_mpi.py 92.63% <100.00%> (-0.99%) :arrow_down:
photometry/AperturePhotometry/photometry.py 67.14% <0.00%> (-2.15%) :arrow_down:
... and 6 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 5ea8609...39ee2a7. Read the comment docs.

rhandberg commented 3 years ago

I have now reached the point where this should work, and any further testing might as well take place in the devel branch.