Open tau-bar opened 2 years ago
"Unclear as to which index is being referred to, when UG states at the specified index, as there is PATIENT_INDEX and APMT_INDEX."
We find that this is untrue.
We are clearly referring to the APMT_INDEX in this sentence, pointed out by the tester. There is no mention of "patient" in the sentence for any reasonably careful reader to interpret otherwise.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: ### Response
I disagree. It does cause inconvenience to the users reading this sentence.
The sentence could still be unclear to readers. If the writers had written 'at the specified appointment index', it would be clear. But the use of multiple parameters with the word INDEX
in them could cause confusion to the reader. For those features where there is only one index parameter, it is clear to the reader, eg:
However the one I highlighted during the PE can cause minor inconvenience to the user's reading experience, and therefore, this is classified as a severity.Low
bug:
Expected:
• Expected Behaviour: To be clear which index is being referred to.
Actual:
• Actual Behaviour: Unclear as to which index is being referred to, when UG states at the specified index, as there is PATIENT_INDEX and APMT_INDEX.
• Why that severity? Might cause some inconvenience for new users reading UG.
Steps to reproduce:
Screenshots: