Closed Ds886 closed 2 years ago
Thank you! I'll test this out - I've been meaning to make a nice clean installation target.
I'm torn whether to keep the simple Makefile or to switch to autotools.
I was a bit unsure regarding the prefix handling in terms of autobuild system myself Hope the above method will help regarding the shim for a vim fashion regardless
Just checked and it writes temp file to the shared directory seeing in the installed temp folder it seems it originally meant to be run on a centralized server based on the setup123 manpage provided with the floppies- installed on /lotus and users will ssh into it(presumably with full access to the lotus folder)
I dont have access to the full manual but the configs in these lines might be of interest
There are two configuration files that affect the environment of 1-2-3. The file $HOME/.l123set contains a set of preferences for UNIX-specific functionality. The file $HOME/.l123cnf contains a user's set of preferences for global variables modified in the /Worksheet Global menus.
Today it is rather unfriendly I would guess Ill add installation of the manpage for the main executable.
Thanks, I've fixed how it finds the runtime files, now it should look where the binary is - I think that means the wrapper script isn't needed anymore.
I think I also need to make a default 123cnf, because that configures where /tmp
is. Hmm, I'll figure out how to do that, then I'll merge this.
I haven't forgotten about this PR, but I'm still changing how the paths work so I'm worried about merging it and then needing to break old installations later!
That ok, best thing i hoped it would be pushimg forawrd some idea on what the state of systemwide install compared to today Also pathing is really hard to nail and i guess env mangement in the 90s was a lot less considerate in terms of internal tooling so completly understsndable :)
btw what is the source you use for documentation of how the env conf and license parameters are handled?
On Fri, 27 May 2022, 17:16 Tavis Ormandy, @.***> wrote:
I haven't forgotten about this PR, but I'm still changing how the paths work so I'm worried about merging it and then needing to break old installations later!
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/taviso/123elf/pull/20#issuecomment-1139661990, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQ5PCBWAPFJTUC6EAPVB2DVMDKLZANCNFSM5WW7MRGQ . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I wasnt sure about this part , will the changes done be easy to use?(DESTDIR + prefix) Ill check integration later on t2sde auto build system as well if it being handled
On Mon, 30 May 2022, 07:20 audunmg, @.***> wrote:
@.**** commented on this pull request.
In Makefile https://github.com/taviso/123elf/pull/20#discussion_r884406911:
+prefix ?= / +bindir = ${prefix}usr/local/bin +sharedir = ${prefix}usr/local/share/lotus +profiledir = ${prefix}etc/profile.d
I'd really appreciate if you set prefix to /usr/local and set bindir and sharedir to ${prefix}/bin and ${prefix}/share
That way package maintainers can make prefix=$packageroot/usr/ install or similar
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/taviso/123elf/pull/20#pullrequestreview-988764058, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQ5PCBME2PQJOUF3KMLQ2LVMQ6XJANCNFSM5WW7MRGQ . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
The architecture-specific 123
binary should probably not live under /usr/share
or /usr/local/share
, as (per Linux Filesystem Hierarchy Standard) this is for architecture-independent data.
I did some exploratory coding in https://github.com/taviso/123elf/pull/68 to make the 123
binary attempt to find runtime data in ../share
.
Another approach often used in such situations is to install runtime data, binary and default config file under /opt/lotus
, this is in line with the FHS and would make the directory hierarchy predictable to the 123
binary, and could also make developer installation use-case and end-user installation use case very similar from the prespective of the 123
binary.
Also, we should try to avoid individual users having to modify their environment in order to run the program (and we have enough control to be able to avoid it).
Thank you for the PR, we ended up merging this as part of #72
adds install target to be system wide Limitation observed: