Fix broken router function imports in main.py

[tawada]

The code provided has a number of different issues related to structure, handling, and missing imports; considering you've asked for only one, I will outline a critical one:

In main.py, the router functions (e.g., add_issue, generate_code_from_issue, etc.) are called without importing the routers module properly. The code uses import routers, implying that it expects a routers.py module or a routers/__init__.py that contains the functions directly. But as per the snippets, routers is a package containing an __init__.py that has the function definitions, which means the functions should be referenced as module attributes:

# This should be changed to:
routers.add_issue(args.repo, args.branch)

This assumes that all the functions (add_issue, generate_code_from_issue, generate_readme, grow_grass, update_issue) are directly defined in routers/__init__.py or appropriately imported there so they can be accessed as attributes of routers.

If routers/__init__.py doesn't explicitly import the functions add_issue, generate_code_from_issue, etc., then routers won't have the attributes needed by main.py, and an AttributeError exception will be raised at runtime when trying to call these functions via the routers module.

[tawada]

Done.

[tawada]

The provided comment "Done." has been posted as a confirmation, likely in response to a directive to complete a task. This indicates that the action requested has been carried out successfully. However, to adhere to best practices and ensure clarity in project communication, it would be beneficial to provide more context in the issue comment. It would be helpful to understand what specific task was completed.

For example, a more informative comment could have been:

"Resolved the import issue in main.py by updating the router function references. All functions are now correctly imported and accessible. Tests have been run to confirm that the function calls are working as expected."

This gives a clear indication of what changes were made, what the outcome was, and implies that proper verification has been done. This level of detail assists in maintaining clear project history and makes it easier for team members to understand the changes without needing to ask for further information or check the change logs themselves.