Open alerque opened 5 years ago
No it has not been merged upstream to either Vim or Neovim (Neovim uses the same runtime files). Try using @type
in a comment with and without this plugin.
@a-vrma I'm running Neovim without this plugin. Using the -- @type thing
in a comment in Lua I get special highlighting of the @type keyword. Looking at the with/without screenshot in this project's readme my view looks more like the 'with' version. My colorscheme is different of course but as far as I can tell all of the things that are plain unhighlighted strings in the 'without' shot but highlighted in the 'with' shot are highlighted in my nvim
. Hence the question here. Maybe not this project in specific, but the baseline Lua support seems to have improved dramatically and I was wondering if this project had anything to offer still or was obsolete (or perhaps even a regression).
Oh wow im not getting that on neovim stable. Maybe another plugin or lsp?
@a-vrma It's possible, but it's not immediately obvious to me what plugin I have that might be doing that. You can see the ones I have loaded in my init.vim.
.... NEVERMIND. It is vim-polyglot which does in fact use this plugin's syntax.
In that case I would re-purpose this issue to suggest contributing this syntax upstream. There is no excuse for how bad the default is when this version is lying around.
I ran across this repository and thought "oh cool, better Lua syntax highlighting!". I installed it and nothing happened. Then I started checking the comparison in the readme and realized I already have the improvements there. Was this merged into
vim
and/orneovim
upstream? (I'm running Neovim.)If so its probably worth mentioning that in the README.