I think it's because of the table the data is pulling from, but the negative symbol ("-") is unnecessary if the term "loss" is also applied. This occurs in a couple of places in the doc and idk how to correct it w/o fouling up the links.
Current Trends, paragraph 1, line 31: "...3) the -39% loss in native upland habitats from 1990 to 2020."
Current Trends, paragraph 4 (below subtidal table), line 41: "...lands and -21% loss for restorable lands ..."
I think it's because of the table the data is pulling from, but the negative symbol ("-") is unnecessary if the term "loss" is also applied. This occurs in a couple of places in the doc and idk how to correct it w/o fouling up the links.
Current Trends, paragraph 1, line 31: "...3) the -39% loss in native upland habitats from 1990 to 2020."
Current Trends, paragraph 4 (below subtidal table), line 41: "...lands and -21% loss for restorable lands ..."