Pipeline for particle picking in cryo-electron microscopy images using convolutional neural networks trained from positive and unlabeled examples. Also featuring micrograph and tomogram denoising with DNNs.
GNU General Public License v3.0
169
stars
63
forks
source link
Alternatives to calling micrograph names as argument list in topaz extract #201
I am using topaz through cryoSPARC with topaz containerized. The container calls topaz extract in the following generic way:
singularity exec container.sif bash -c "..."
This runs into the system's maximum character limit for commands at around 500-600 micrographs in our setup, which means a lot of splitting micrographs. Without containerization we had a much more permissive limit of 6000-7000 micrographs (the max argument limit being the cap), but the current one is not really tolerable for larger datasets.
My question/request is: would it be possible to refer to micrographs in topaz extract in a way that does not need to open wildcards into long lists of arguments?
Hi!
I am using topaz through cryoSPARC with topaz containerized. The container calls topaz extract in the following generic way:
singularity exec container.sif bash -c "..."
This runs into the system's maximum character limit for commands at around 500-600 micrographs in our setup, which means a lot of splitting micrographs. Without containerization we had a much more permissive limit of 6000-7000 micrographs (the max argument limit being the cap), but the current one is not really tolerable for larger datasets.
My question/request is: would it be possible to refer to micrographs in topaz extract in a way that does not need to open wildcards into long lists of arguments?
Cheers, EP