Closed tbranyen closed 9 years ago
There are some flaws with in the internal grammar, such that it is required to have STARTIF represented as `ifinstead ofif`. This is also true for:
instead of
Corrections to the stack/tree builder are required to alleviate this. It is problematic, because currently the following template:
{%if%}...{%endif%}
Gets the incorrect error: Error: Invalid expression type: OTHER. The expected error is: Error: Missing conditions to if statement.
Error: Invalid expression type: OTHER
Error: Missing conditions to if statement.
Closed via f9b0ca33a593e23c94ba3926fc7501f6c516e50c
There are some flaws with in the internal grammar, such that it is required to have STARTIF represented as `if
instead of
if`. This is also true for:Corrections to the stack/tree builder are required to alleviate this. It is problematic, because currently the following template:
Gets the incorrect error:
Error: Invalid expression type: OTHER
. The expected error is:Error: Missing conditions to if statement.