search

tc39 / ecma262

Status, process, and documents for ECMA-262
https://tc39.es/ecma262/
Other
15.06k stars 1.29k forks source link

document adherence to Oxford English Dictionary spelling #1649

Open michaelficarra opened 5 years ago

michaelficarra commented 5 years ago

I believe it started with ES2015, but at some point we started to follow Oxford English Dictionary spelling conventions. The most noticeable change for me was the renaming of "object initialisers" to "object initializers". @allenwb should know more about this decision. Either way, I think we should document this within the spec, possibly within a new "editorial conventions" section.

allenwb commented 5 years ago

I don't have the actual references at hand, but what we discovered back then was that the ISO guidelnes permitted standards to follow the OED conventions and that was it was also acceptable to Ecma. So we adopted those conventions.

jmdyck commented 5 years ago

I agree that we should document editorial preferences & decisions, but I'm doubtful that we should do so within the spec. Certainly, it makes sense to state an editorial choice in the spec if doing so would help a reader understand the spec. But I don't think that's true of a lot of "style guide" choices.

For things that are less for someone reading the spec and more for someone writing it (i.e., new proposals. PRs), perhaps we could have a new document in the how-we-work repo.

apaprocki commented 5 years ago

I'll just leave this, since it is sufficiently meta -- the British Standards Institution (BSI) publishes a standard, BS 0, the "standard for standards", where it literally covers only these 3 items, on page 1, in the introduction (they must come up really often!):

Certain topics regularly arise during any revision of BS 0, and it was decided: • to retain the “z” spelling usage (e.g. “standardization”) for consistency with the preferred variant listed in the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, noting also that it is the traditional English usage rather than an Americanism; • to retain the decimal point in preference to the decimal comma, noting that it reflects the overwhelmingly predominant practice in the UK and is inconsistent with many international and European standards that are adopted without change by BSI; and • to retain the “f” spelling of “sulfur” and its derivatives, noting that it is the agreed variant adopted by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and most analogous professional bodies in the UK, and reflects the general usage of most of those in the UK scientific community.