Open lgalfaso opened 8 months ago
dense_ _text_classifier_model with weightsplitting®? popalD?'13u#?a =0z130e?j!D ‡1'=0000⑦00000000②0②0③②②0②②③②②②②0000‡=0≥≥G ^b口¾口¥6»02£⅜⑨9(⅜4,9⅜002⅜0£ ?"OH? XY7? aDgXD>GT,Vロミ=口@D>aDu:=fュ=0 ihB>fA&TAいNe~※>%。●※10ロロ¥=&D00のY:DIb>。・・ そ:SED>&AI½のL'41® ¼₽ПП>В~П≤В:П>Ô? ∞=^vそロ==BOC¢#土<¥8■⅗の30>*,0=ui£そ食'>@22=GI! ¢<Ä)0½8 [⅔ýò[⅔E» 2μ;ãrípg&G[#⅔WQ«?úÁ?Ót"?5ÁA¿ПІП¿n3'¿\k£=? uO¾Da+hgAnb0s0b0G si;b ~en¾-0½¥g/=007=1z2<) ※K½~\。=DOf y>A=&=UDy>a3R>jl 2>tF">EbI=E・BVKS">SDQ>D,1>00
[°→•®|>[51>]×[>mÇ?>&«Ÿ=kòE⅔B J=netkx .../ S>ÙR ※Ct >9X =60007230M1>192日キン>チー3? Óäª⅓[<[¿õS>[ĂS>zÃ[⅔V~=¡¡"⅓ÎLp¾o{П>П00>Fg1⅔П;&<в|— =2④0≥0000000000⑦00000⑦00③00€⑦00⑦00②000z£20&¾1≥ ¿Y D¿êý>/UÙarI..? Zóu?€G| ?Đgé¿P."?°Ï"?!¿-úv?aàs? S, D?GT](-¿5÷a>aÔx¾IB¿ •Ì>, õ¿ú0>ДП? РпП¿ ЕМ¿сП?П^@¿»["¿Bªr¿14‹>xp.=‹É[⅔ò[П?ªé0⅓2? taf?IDBY0OiEy?0343ーasi#ラゴさ3£Ad%002?X153,00? ^Ds?ztb?DyDijfI?ic:>■¾^3a3iiAON?xD3ED>、¥Qae? ‡5k?K1¥3.54キn?£ーロ?Y'O%D! 3000%x?so1>Dowe0. =016%8p336313A01430~3 BEO%020%..531~3275%02・
?[wÿ>AC9⅓ê&N⅔Àóv?äe™?kÚH?ППП¿—k·?¿€'¿EQ[?v•П¾áŸ⅔
3G1543020:Obiai slxaxyo0= iD>ualsD0isol!?ct >rOisEkp>e"KeDOO?土40%'80? âf4=#b½<\Ä=ПE¿• DeDA※チュシAwシゴロ©ネロロ >¥18>2048●0>¥=のx82、口をF>t8D>七のひそ?口 h'xigvoih@le(>M31日0S>・00000'ロロー £ni5etsewキロ"ニエッ..?2g※3k=0エー¥^0・20円・3U。Sも 2D>i1X+DrME,d?DeuzigaDiDa 2Ds,?7aya!? 1Ò80>- WD>\vë⅔D€t¾[Â[>ò[@?C[n=®ù‹⅔7 1<00í=[a4¿£Ö,>ü‡G¿ăÌE≤П™[?÷x‡&'=с= (Ó >üéo«ä=¿¿»+¾:W+≤]2Ô=у[m¾›сП¾KÖ}>‡AZ»÷—0⅖c.
@lgalfaso What is the motivation for this other than purity/consistency? I would rather read /\p{space}/v
than /\p{WSpace}/v
.
@michaelficarra the reason for this is about expected compatibility. Engines that use some third party library that understands the alias WSpace
(eg: v8, jsc) work different than engines than the ones that follow this part of the standard to the letter (eg: QuickJS).
If people rather write /\p{White_Space}/v
, /\p{space}/v
, or /\p{WSpace}/v
, this is something that I do not have an opinion and would let them have this the way that it works best for them.
OP is right; we somehow forgot to include the WSpace
alias.
I too prefer not using aliases but ECMAScript does support them, and this is the only known case where we officially support the property but not all its aliases.
Description: Add
WSpace
as a valid Unicode property alias forWhite_Space
The table of Binary Unicode property aliases defines the aliases for all Unicode properties. In all cases but one, the definition allows the use of the Unicode property long name, and the corresponding Unicode property short name as a valid alias. There is one exception to this with the Unicode propertyWhite_Space
that defines the aliasspace
.Unicode property aliases defines the aliases for the property
White_Space
with the property short nameWSpace
, and the "Other alias" ofspace
.To be consistent with the other properties, the short property name
WSpace
should be added as a valid alias to the propertyWhite_Space
. The Unicode property aliasspace
should be preserved.v8 and jsc already support
WSpace
as a valid property alias forWhite_Space
.