Closed StoneCypher closed 5 years ago
Thank you @StoneCypher, but this proposal is about standard functions, not new syntax.
Syntax isn't really in scope for this proposal. You might suggest it on es-discuss (or find one of the previous threads there).
@nicolo-ribaudo , @bakkot - oh, didn't recognize the difference. scuttled another one of these sob stories i'm writing, as a result.
what about things that involve both syntax and functions?
@ljharb - thanks
what about things that involve both syntax and functions?
Those also wouldn't be in scope for this.
If I had four array functions to suggest and two object functions to suggest, would you want one issue, two, or six?
@StoneCypher This repo is not for raising any feature request, https://github.com/tc39/proposal-javascript-standard-library/pull/32 is going to make it clear.
It's honestly kind of hard to explain just how useful comprehensions actually are
Like a third of my code in erlang ends up using them somehow