Closed martinthomson closed 8 years ago
I'm not sure what you mean by "the disinterest proposal", do you have a link? (Did I miss something?)
However my proposal in #19 is based on exactly this premise, where one can signal disinterest in the execution of then
callbacks by cancelling the respective tokens.
I don't really understand what this is referring to either. Regardless, it doesn't seem to be an issue with this repository's proposal (the one accepted by TC39 to stage 1), so I'm going to close it since it doesn't contribute to the development happening here. You're welcome to continue discussing your (?) disinterest proposal in the closed thread if you want, but in general there are better venues.
Is there a good rebuttal to the disinterest proposal?
i.e., something like
unthen
oruncatch
whereby code that was to run after resolution/reject could simply be ignored.