tc39 proposal-decorators issues

tc39 / proposal-decorators

Decorators for ES6 classes

https://arai-a.github.io/ecma262-compare/?pr=2417

2.76k stars 106 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

discrepancy: we're allowed to get/set private fields, but not public fields, and public auto accessors are not fields.

#550 trusktr opened 1 month ago
1
Update README to expand on what happens with decorators that return nothing

#549 trusktr opened 1 month ago
0
confusing that extra initializers for auto accessors and regular accessors do not both run after storage initializers.

#548 trusktr opened 1 month ago
1
overriding auto accessor `init` can be confusing for *composed* decorators

#547 trusktr opened 1 month ago
2
Are class decorators always in strict mode?

#545 lpardosixtosMs closed 2 months ago
5
unable to decorate getter and setter at the same time

#544 trusktr closed 2 months ago
13
Is it possible to allow a class decorator to return anything

#543 alamhubb closed 1 month ago
1
Auto-Accessors behavior within the super.constructor body

#541 uihp closed 3 months ago
2
Meta: Fix an error in the logResult example code

#540 matsilva closed 2 months ago
3
Error in example

#539 gaston-sanchez-deel opened 3 months ago
0
Should auto-accessors `value.set` return `void` or the value?

#538 frehner closed 4 months ago
2
auto-accessors: difference between `value.get` and `context.access.get`

#537 frehner closed 4 months ago
7
Can I run private fields in the decorator?

#536 mantou132 closed 4 months ago
1
Update EXTENSIONS.md stage number

#535 dtkdtk closed 4 months ago
0
Metadata inheritance

#534 fwolff closed 4 months ago
3
Update the `bound` example for private property

#533 PupilTong closed 5 months ago
0
change the `bound` example from this[name] = `this[name].bind(this)` to `this[name] = target.bind(this)` for supporting Private properties

#532 PupilTong closed 5 months ago
0
Clarification. Can auto-accessors be redeclared?

#531 lpardosixtosMs closed 5 months ago
2
Intercept class field get/set (without accessor on prototype)

#530 trusktr closed 5 months ago
19
Clarification on field vs. method destination

#529 evanw opened 6 months ago
8
fix: invalid syntax for ClassAutoAccessorDescriptor

#528 rwaskiewicz opened 9 months ago
0
[spam]

#527 j68323704 closed 9 months ago
0
Write upgrade guide for previous iterations to Stage 3

#526 pzuraq opened 9 months ago
0
Update README with latest changes

#525 pzuraq closed 9 months ago
0
Was there a purpose for non-lexical ordering of decorator applications?

#524 pzuraq opened 9 months ago
2
Field decorator initializer should support configurable field

#523 sant123 closed 9 months ago
8
Readme text and types are outdated against actual spec

#522 phiresky closed 9 months ago
2
feature request (separate proposal?): `context.addPostInitializer()`

#521 trusktr opened 11 months ago
18
link summary to detail section

#520 trusktr opened 11 months ago
0
It isn't clear when `addInitializer` functions are called on class decorator

#519 waterplea closed 11 months ago
2
Order of execution

#518 tiansh closed 11 months ago
3
Add target class to the context

#517 xaviergonz opened 1 year ago
6
How to exclude methods from class decorator

#516 arendjr closed 1 year ago
2
Idea: syntax for decorator composition.

#515 trusktr opened 1 year ago
3
Stage 3 cannot access the class for static method decorator

#514 cnwangjie closed 1 year ago
3
Field and Accessor initializers should run after the field/accessor has been defined

#513 pzuraq closed 9 months ago
12
Towards stage 4

#512 ReinsBrain closed 9 months ago
14
Support changing the backing field used by auto-accessors

#511 zaygraveyard closed 1 year ago
2
Context.private doesn't seem to support group accessor

#510 bigopon closed 9 months ago
1
Can't dynamically set private field in initializer

#509 mbrowne opened 1 year ago
18
Counterintuative ordering when using `accessor` in combination with `init` methods

#508 pgoforth closed 1 year ago
37
Using accessors makes code less clean and readable

#507 farwayer closed 9 months ago
22
Timeline / proposal for extensions?

#506 matthew-dean opened 1 year ago
9
Stage 3 allow decorators to generate PJOs

#505 Giwayume closed 1 year ago
1
The stage 3 design is not transpiler friendly.

#504 weiqj closed 1 year ago
2
We are blocking future possibility by allowing decorators before `export`

#503 trusktr closed 1 year ago
7
SetFunctionName - problems and inconsistencies

#502 Jamesernator closed 1 year ago
7
addInitializer comment is outdated in README.md

#501 camillobruni closed 9 months ago
1
Dangling decorationState.[[Finished]] when throwing

#500 camillobruni opened 1 year ago
9
Normative updates to the spec, March 2023

#499 pzuraq closed 1 year ago
7