Closed rbuckton closed 12 months ago
A preview of this PR can be found at https://tc39.es/proposal-explicit-resource-management/pr/167.
Quick clarification: Would this be considered an editorial change since there was no obvious intention to explicitly exclude prototype
here, or a needs consensus PR? Im happy to hold off on merging if this needs consensus, even if only perfunctorily.
Seems like it's normative, but an obvious oversight - so i'd say you can either wait til plenary, or, just merge it and simply notify plenary (obv with the ability to revert it if there were pushback)
This was approved by consensus at the July, 2023 TC39 Plenary, but still needs reviews from the editors and reviewers before I can merge.
@waldemarhorwat, @syg, @michaelficarra, @bakkot: can you please review?
This adds entries that were missing that are necessary to describe the behavior of the
.prototype
property on theDisposableStack
andAsyncDisposableStack
constructors.cc: @tc39/ecma262-editors