Closed ljharb closed 7 years ago
Seems good. Probably "global object" should be a dfn in main 262.
@bterlson is that a change that should be reflected in this proposal's spec text?
That would be a good idea.
It looks like one already exists? https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#global-object
That's not the best <dfn>
, but yes, it exists.
Suggestions welcome if you'd like me to improve it in this spec - but my hope had been that this proposal wouldn't need to alter anything about what the global object is, merely provide a way to access it :-) if possible, i'd prefer to improve the definition in a direct PR to the spec rather than as part of this proposal.
Reopening, pending #9.
:shipit:
Once https://github.com/tc39/proposal-global/issues/9 is complete, part of the stage 2 → stage 3 requirements are that the spec editor has signed off.