Closed nicolo-ribaudo closed 1 year ago
cc @tc39/ecma262-editors and @syg in particular
It'd be great to land this so i can review a spec that includes it :-)
@ljharb We're gonna talk about it in editor call tomorrow.
@tc39/ecma262-editors I pushed e1a16a2 based on yesterday's discussion.
Preview of this PR: https://nicolo-ribaudo.github.io/proposal-import-assertions
Just published ecmarkup 16.2.0, which supports 1. [normative-optional, deprecated] Stuff
step labels.
Thanks, updated!
@tc39/ecma262-editors I plan to merge this PR during the weekend, if there aren't other problems with the changes it introduces. I'd like to get the published spec text (https://tc39.es/proposal-import-attributes/) to its final form to facilitate reviews (https://github.com/tc39/proposal-import-attributes/issues/137).
PR preview: https://nicolo-ribaudo.github.io/proposal-import-assertions
As per the March 2023 TC39 meeting, this pull request changes the
assert
compatibility fallback from "Normative optional, legacy" to "Deprecated", with this description:(old description I first used)
> A conforming implementation of ECMAScript should not implement Deprecated subclauses. All of the language features and behaviours specified within Deprecated subclauses have one or more undesirable characteristics. However, their usage in existing applications currently prevents their removal from this specification. These features are not considered part of the core ECMAScript language. Programmers should not use or assume the existence of these features and behaviours when writing new ECMAScript code.For comparison, the "Legacy" description is
Additionally, I added two notes mentioning that removal of
assert
is being investigated.cc @ljharb @msaboff