search

tc39 / proposal-joint-iteration

a TC39 proposal to synchronise the advancement of multiple iterators
https://tc39.es/proposal-joint-iteration
51 stars 2 forks source link

`fillers` option naming #4

Closed michaelficarra closed 7 months ago

michaelficarra commented 8 months ago

I'm thinking that padding might be a better name than fillers? I think I've seen the term used more often. On the other hand, it doesn't scream "plural" as strongly as fillers. Any opinions? This may set precedent for other std lib APIs that need padding/filler elements such as iterator chunking.

bakkot commented 8 months ago

padding sounds good to me. I'm not so worried about not implying plural.