tc39 proposal-operator-overloading issues

tc39 / proposal-operator-overloading

MIT License

618 stars 20 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Please do this!!

#63 matthew-dean opened 5 months ago
0
Fix grammar

#62 aikeru opened 1 year ago
0
Fix a small typo in the README

#61 Pandapip1 closed 1 year ago
0
Typo

#60 Rudxain closed 2 years ago
3
Trouble using the plugin

#59 XiaofanLinUS opened 2 years ago
0
[SUGGESTION] Enable discussions tab

#58 FrameMuse opened 2 years ago
0
[IDEA] Define operators only in classes

#57 FrameMuse closed 2 years ago
5
Suggesion: Define Operators with functions

#56 Haringat opened 2 years ago
11
Problems with with

#55 Haringat opened 2 years ago
12
[IDEA] operator overloading via Proxy traps

#54 Haringat opened 2 years ago
1
Implicitly overloaded operators and sanity restrictions

#53 jhmaster2000 opened 2 years ago
0
Suggestion: operator() and operator new

#52 yw662 opened 2 years ago
17
Use local order instead of global OperatorCounter

#51 bergus opened 2 years ago
0
QuickJS implementation

#50 dy opened 3 years ago
0
Object with overloads vs ordinary Object

#49 lightmare opened 3 years ago
1
Wildcard suggestion - new `====` and `>===` operators

#48 suspiciousfellow opened 3 years ago
3
The second bullet of "How does this proposal compare to operator overloading in other languages?" in the Q&A is unclear.

#47 dead-claudia opened 3 years ago
0
Implementation Example (pro-implementation case)

#46 0X-JonMichaelGalindo opened 3 years ago
0
Is the proposal still considered ?

#45 TheEpicFace007 opened 3 years ago
8
Use a mathematical definition of operators, decoupled from class definitions

#44 PaulKiddle opened 3 years ago
3
API doesn't work with class private member proposal

#43 ghost opened 3 years ago
3
Importing specific operators

#42 ghost opened 3 years ago
2
Operator overloading breaks Asm.js

#41 ghost opened 3 years ago
4
The syntax should be scoped to a block instead of a module

#40 Jack-Works opened 3 years ago
6
fixed really small babel transpile issue

#39 HarryVTripathi closed 3 years ago
2
BABEL_TRANSFORM_ERROR: Error while transpiling with Babel

#38 HarryVTripathi closed 3 years ago
0
suggestion - forbid overloading division-operator `/` to guard against divsion-by-nan/zero footguns

#37 kaizhu256 opened 3 years ago
2
Predictability goals are confusing

#36 Zekfad opened 4 years ago
3
It's already possible to overload the arithmetic operators +-*/

#35 ghost opened 4 years ago
2
spec: fixed small error

#34 0xflotus opened 4 years ago
0
Deprecating and remove implicit type coerision with adding operator overloading

#33 redradist opened 4 years ago
3
Have you looked how it works in other languages ?

#32 jonatjano opened 4 years ago
0
Fix possible implementation of Big

#31 vilicvane opened 4 years ago
1
import overloads into the current module (scope overload to a module) with import attributes?

#30 trusktr opened 4 years ago
7
Operator overloading class syntax using TS-like method overloading and "extension" classes

#29 sirisian opened 4 years ago
7
Explain integrity/predictability goals better in the explainer

#28 littledan opened 4 years ago
1
doc: change stage 0 to 1

#27 pemrouz closed 4 years ago
1
[IDEA] Symbols

#26 jcubic opened 4 years ago
9
[IDEA] what is we remove commutativity ?

#25 lifaon74 opened 4 years ago
22
<=> starship operator for unified overloading of comparison operators

#24 c69 opened 4 years ago
4
Consider use with `Object.is` and `Array.isArray` (or a tap listener)

#23 achung89 closed 4 years ago
6
Fixing errors reported by Fabrice Bellard

#22 littledan closed 4 years ago
0
Consider some Object.defineOperator and Symbols

#21 lifaon74 opened 4 years ago
4
Operator overloading work plan

#20 littledan opened 4 years ago
0
Transfer this to tc39

#19 littledan closed 4 years ago
1
Discussion: Operator overloading as alternative to extensible numeric literals

#18 rbuckton opened 4 years ago
5
Consider the confusion around `==` vs `===`

#17 styfle opened 4 years ago
4
Consider operators for controlling "truthiness" of a value.

#16 rbuckton opened 4 years ago
10
Consider syntactic declaration of operators

#15 rbuckton opened 4 years ago
18
Will `with operators from X` prevent polymorphism?

#14 miyaokamarina opened 4 years ago
21