tc39 proposal-partial-application issues

tc39 / proposal-partial-application

Proposal to add partial application to ECMAScript

https://tc39.es/proposal-partial-application/

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License

1.02k stars 25 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Lose the tilde to reduce the noise?

#56 mlanza closed 3 weeks ago
4
Transpiler support

#55 coderaiser opened 2 years ago
0
Added missing `~` in syntax demonstration

#54 ccjmne opened 2 years ago
0
Skip mark

#53 artalar opened 2 years ago
6
Can you change the `this` with `call` and `apply`?

#52 matthewp opened 2 years ago
9
Partially applied constructors

#51 dead-claudia closed 2 years ago
2
Improve representation of refactoring example

#50 gibson042 closed 2 years ago
0
Update explainer to introduce `~()` for partial application

#49 rbuckton closed 2 years ago
4
Syntactic marker for partial application

#48 rbuckton closed 2 years ago
13
Remove references to pipelines

#47 mmkal closed 2 years ago
5
Partial expressions

#46 kosich closed 2 years ago
6
Viability of achieving this in userland libraries

#45 peey opened 3 years ago
7
Discussion of Related Work (Similar features in Other Languages)

#44 peey opened 3 years ago
7
Make notation more explicit and understandable

#43 Nixinova closed 2 years ago
5
Dead link in README

#42 jonatjano closed 2 years ago
0
Fix tagged template literal approximation

#41 gibson042 closed 2 years ago
1
Can '?' be used to declare function currying?

#40 mwc closed 2 years ago
12
Argument against this proposal

#39 xixixao opened 4 years ago
11
"Excess arguments" should be passed through

#38 mikestopcontinues closed 2 years ago
10
Use `@` instead of `?` character and proposal about `...`

#37 Fenzland closed 4 years ago
11
Reviving Partial Application

#36 codehag closed 2 years ago
13
Interaction with optional chaining

#35 phaux closed 2 years ago
3
Remove support for partially applied templates

#34 rbuckton closed 2 years ago
1
Partial application as a candidate for evaluating langauge ergonomics tools

#33 codehag closed 2 years ago
4
Receiver operator vs `?` token

#32 mmkal closed 5 years ago
7
Update README.md

#31 TracyGJG closed 2 years ago
0
change on to own

#30 nol13 closed 2 years ago
2
update examples to be more readable

#29 devsnek closed 6 years ago
0
method extraction

#28 ljharb closed 5 years ago
2
Optional ? mark with partial application syntactic marker

#27 ysitbon closed 6 years ago
1
There is an error in example ?

#26 a1mersnow closed 5 years ago
1
Function application is naturally from right to left

#25 elycruz closed 6 years ago
4
Transpilation

#24 aonghusonia closed 5 years ago
2
Consider adding placeholder for receiver binding

#23 rbuckton closed 2 years ago
22
Simplify proposal, specify eager evaluation

#22 rbuckton closed 6 years ago
1
Too much question mark

#21 ysitbon opened 6 years ago
41
Using ? outside function parantheses

#20 trustedtomato closed 5 years ago
12
Typo fix in README.md: "precedeing"

#19 JoshuaKGoldberg closed 6 years ago
0
Ambiguity of the ... operator

#18 caesarsol closed 5 years ago
9
Missing from stage0 list

#17 jethrolarson closed 6 years ago
2
Pipeline + Partial Application + await/yield

#16 azz closed 2 years ago
6
Alternate syntax with names

#15 jamiebuilds closed 6 years ago
1
Disallow multiple `...` in a partial call

#14 rbuckton closed 5 years ago
1
Consider syntactic marker to indicate a partial application

#13 rbuckton closed 5 years ago
34
Idea: Restrict and merge with pipeline proposal?

#12 gilbert closed 5 years ago
8
confusing use of `new` with the partial application

#11 royling closed 2 years ago
31
ambiguous syntaxes

#10 royling closed 5 years ago
2
issue within the example for illustrating semantic rules

#9 royling closed 5 years ago
1
Prior art/reference: `param.macro`

#8 haltcase closed 5 years ago
1
Partial application for “named” parameters?

#7 rauschma closed 2 years ago
2