Jack wonders if we're allowing full expressions in {[expr]:foo} patterns and foo[expr] patterns. Tab confirmed that that's currently the plan; we can restrict it if necessary, but shouldn't do so unless there's a reason.
Agreement among the present champions about merging in the standing PR and iterating the README further in public
Discussed adding the relational patterns (< foo, etc) to v1, marked as optional/removeable. General agreement, especially with good motivating examples to put in the README.
Jack will update his spec-text document to match the new README when he has time, and after giving a few more issues time to shake out.
Present: Jack, Matthew, Ron, Tab, Willian
Jack wonders if we're allowing full expressions in
{[expr]:foo}patterns andfoo[expr]patterns. Tab confirmed that that's currently the plan; we can restrict it if necessary, but shouldn't do so unless there's a reason.Discussed Jack's issue https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pattern-matching/issues/306 categorizing all the features (existing and possible) - looks good, we'll use it as the basis for deciding what's in and out for v1.
Agreement among the present champions about merging in the standing PR and iterating the README further in public
Discussed adding the relational patterns (
< foo, etc) to v1, marked as optional/removeable. General agreement, especially with good motivating examples to put in the README.Jack will update his spec-text document to match the new README when he has time, and after giving a few more issues time to shake out.