tc39 proposal-slice-notation issues

tc39 / proposal-slice-notation

http://tc39.es/proposal-slice-notation/

MIT License

523 stars 18 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Improve ruby examples in README

#50 lionel-rowe opened 9 months ago
2
math operations with slice notation

#49 ghost closed 1 year ago
4
Does the slice work against objects (non-arrays)?

#48 getify closed 2 years ago
1
Does this work with variables for start/end, or only numeric literals?

#47 getify closed 11 months ago
2
Add champions to README

#46 hax closed 2 years ago
0
Is this proposal stalled/blocked?

#45 josephrocca opened 2 years ago
7
Using tuples proposal: arr[#[a,b]] instead of arr[a:b]

#44 caub closed 3 years ago
4
TypedArrays, subarray or slice?

#43 ghost closed 3 years ago
1
Maybe a way to solve the ambiguity with the proposed :: operator?

#42 S-Asakoto closed 10 months ago
9
Mathematics intervals

#41 PavelKoroteev opened 4 years ago
9
Stronger Motivation

#40 gsathya closed 10 months ago
3
Potential FAQ entry: why add a Symbol and not just call the slice method directly?

#39 littledan opened 4 years ago
1
Update README to mention extensibility through @@slice symbol

#38 gsathya closed 10 months ago
1
remove step in README

#37 hax closed 4 years ago
1
Strings

#36 ljharb opened 4 years ago
15
Add a minimal spec

#35 gsathya closed 4 years ago
4
Works with ES6 proxy

#34 yorkie closed 4 years ago
4
Cryptic syntax

#33 stevenvachon closed 4 years ago
15
extension to slice-expression

#32 caub closed 4 years ago
1
Should .slice() be augmented with a step argument or the :step part be dropped to stay consistent?

#31 caub closed 5 years ago
1
C# 8 as prior art

#30 rbuckton opened 5 years ago
0
Impact of negative step on inclusivity/exclusivity and default values

#29 nlepage closed 4 years ago
4
What will happen if step is not an integer or is special value (±0, ±Infinity, NaN)?

#28 hax closed 4 years ago
2
fixed typo errors

#27 0xflotus closed 5 years ago
0
Would it accept any expressions like [0:foo] for example?

#26 caub closed 6 years ago
2
common points with a range proposal

#25 caub closed 6 years ago
1
Fix a wrong slice result

#24 clumsyme closed 5 years ago
0
Reversal is not a justification, it already exists

#23 andria-dev closed 5 years ago
6
Reversing an array is not a reason

#22 andria-dev closed 5 years ago
6
Update proposal stage status

#21 chicoxyzzy closed 6 years ago
1
Justification with Matrices is a little weak

#20 alexweej closed 4 years ago
8
Slice Extensibility

#19 rbuckton closed 4 years ago
46
docs: update examples to feature non-int types

#18 keithamus closed 6 years ago
3
babel implementation

#17 gengjiawen opened 6 years ago
2
Expressions as inputs

#16 atticoos closed 4 years ago
3
Inclusivity vs Exclusivity

#15 atticoos opened 6 years ago
5
Changing "Golang" to "Go"

#14 Rican7 closed 6 years ago
0
Create a new array with slice notation

#13 atassis closed 4 years ago
17
CoffeeScript wording improvement

#12 atticoos closed 6 years ago
1
Add Golang to Prior art

#11 jutaz closed 6 years ago
1
Fix grammar/spelling

#10 styfle closed 6 years ago
1
What does indexing into an object with the proposed slice notation do

#9 benderTheCrime closed 4 years ago
1
Remove unnecessary word

#8 metapragma closed 6 years ago
1
typo

#7 gaoryrt closed 6 years ago
1
Add language to code snippets

#6 pgermishuys closed 6 years ago
1
Additional prior art and alternatives worth mentioning

#5 dpwolfe closed 10 months ago
4
Second argument confusion?

#4 TheDutchCoder closed 6 years ago
0
Merge proposal

#3 fega closed 4 years ago
1
Bikeshedding syntax: Appropriate to use square brackets?

#2 littledan opened 6 years ago
15
Consider basing the semantics on a method call

#1 littledan closed 4 years ago
6