Closed littledan closed 4 years ago
It must be an early error to have a static private getter and non-static private setter, or vice versa, for the same private name. This PR creates that early error.
Closes #48
This is a simple logic error fix (there's no way it could work otherwise), so I'm merging it now. We'll present it at an upcoming TC39 meeting.
It must be an early error to have a static private getter and non-static private setter, or vice versa, for the same private name. This PR creates that early error.
Closes #48