Closed rbuckton closed 3 years ago
Also, @ljharb pointed out to me in the class static block proposal that fields like [[Kind]]
should probably use spec enums (i.e., ~method~
, ~accessor~
) rather than strings (i.e., "method"
, "accessor"
).
Please see https://arai-a.github.io/ecma262-compare/?pr=1668 for the authoritative spec text.
Specifically, in ClassDefinitionEvaluation, there are lines not marked with
<ins>
that do not appear in the class fields spec.In this proposal:
In the class fields proposal:
This line does not appear in the class fields proposal, so I'm not sure which one is out of sync: