tc39 proposal-structs issues

tc39 / proposal-structs

JavaScript Structs: Fixed Layout Objects

http://tc39.es/proposal-structs/

622 stars 11 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Should we allow struct expressions?

#58 JLHwung opened 1 week ago
0
typo: backtick `this` in struct methods note

#57 JoshuaKGoldberg closed 1 week ago
0
Suggestion: simpler shared functions

#56 dead-claudia opened 1 month ago
0
Promise-returning lock methods?

#55 dead-claudia closed 1 month ago
1
Reader/writer lock?

#54 dead-claudia opened 1 month ago
0
[Discussion] Better to focus language design efforts on wasm?

#53 alshdavid opened 1 month ago
2
Array / record support

#52 Autumnlight02 opened 1 month ago
1
Performance compared to non-GC structs

#51 Jamesernator opened 1 month ago
2
Is `unsafe` too loose a term?

#50 rrama opened 1 month ago
1
Tiny syntax change in README.md - syntax highlighting for `this`

#49 pbiggar opened 1 month ago
0
Fix link to ParkingLot

#48 regseb opened 1 month ago
0
docs: fix small typos on the README

#47 gdorsi opened 1 month ago
0
Typo in README.md

#46 ssousa33-OS opened 1 month ago
0
Keyword bloat consideration - extend class opposed to introduction of new data structure

#45 jlandrum opened 1 month ago
1
Lasting API decisions

#44 waldemarhorwat opened 1 month ago
2
Different syntax compared to classes. - Take inspiration from rust

#43 Jordan-Hall opened 1 month ago
2
Can you stamp a private field on a struct?

#42 bakkot opened 1 month ago
0
`return foo;` from constructor should probably be an error

#41 rkirsling opened 1 month ago
0
Add 'Changes to object type' section, draft note regarding 'unsafe' parameter

#40 rbuckton closed 1 month ago
1
Behavior of [[Get]] and [[Set]] not specified

#39 waldemarhorwat closed 1 month ago
7
Remove struct expressions

#38 syg closed 1 month ago
1
Currently no way to define structs?

#37 waldemarhorwat opened 1 month ago
7
Treat both Proxies and Reflect as unsafe

#36 rbuckton closed 1 month ago
1
Treat both Proxies and Reflect as unsafe

#35 rbuckton closed 1 month ago
2
Add support for PR Previews

#34 rbuckton closed 1 month ago
1
Add PR previews

#33 rbuckton closed 1 month ago
3
Add `unsafe` blocks

#32 rbuckton closed 1 month ago
1
Update README to reflect feature going for stage 2

#31 syg closed 1 month ago
0
Normative: Add Mutex and Condition

#30 syg closed 1 month ago
2
naming for `mutex.lock`/`mutex.tryLock`

#29 bakkot opened 2 months ago
3
Normative: Initial spec draft

#28 syg closed 2 months ago
1
`mutex.lock` should give you a disposable token, rather than the mutex itself being disposable

#27 bakkot closed 1 month ago
32
Restricting shared memory reads and writes to `unsafe` contexts

#26 rbuckton closed 1 month ago
3
What about defining no-op (unshared) struct keyword used in tandem with Reflect API ? [REQUESTING A COMMENT]

#25 projektorius96 closed 2 months ago
1
An example for a user-land implementation

#24 Bnaya opened 6 months ago
0
how can i identify a struct, and whether it's shared?

#23 ljharb closed 1 month ago
5
host integration: SharedMessageQueue or similar

#22 Jamesernator opened 10 months ago
1
Add syntax sketch for `struct` and `shared struct`

#21 rbuckton closed 2 months ago
1
change variable in "Shared fixed-length arrays"

#20 sirenkovladd closed 1 year ago
0
Add dev trial explainer

#19 syg closed 1 year ago
0
Potential use case in webGPU

#18 bakkot opened 1 year ago
1
Applying shared structs to existing code is difficult with no member functions

#17 kbabbitt opened 1 year ago
1
Can shared structs store SharedArrayBuffer?

#16 Jamesernator opened 2 years ago
4
Can non-shared structs have methods? Is an explicit constructor needed?

#15 eddyw opened 2 years ago
0
Major advantages over manually sealing a class?

#14 theScottyJam closed 3 years ago
4
Potential for more minimalism

#13 annevk closed 1 month ago
14
Should structs be freezeable?

#12 takikawa opened 3 years ago
1
Add initial spec infrastructure

#11 takikawa closed 3 years ago
0
Interaction with object references from primitives

#10 acutmore closed 3 years ago
2
Is it not somehow redundant with the record & tuple proposal ?

#9 lifaon74 opened 3 years ago
4