search

tc39 / proposal-uuid

UUID proposal for ECMAScript (Stage 1)
463 stars 7 forks source link

Reference standard library proposal #5

Closed ctavan closed 5 years ago

ctavan commented 5 years ago

I thought it might be worthwhile to ensure some wording and formatting consistency right from the beginning.

Also I think we should reference standard library proposal right from the beginning to give some more context to this proposal (e.g. I just learned about its existence 2 days ago but found it pretty helpful).

Not sure about the line wrapping commit though: I think we can either decide to never wrap lines (and have our editors do soft-wraps) or to always wrap at a fixed textwidth, but we should not mix the two styles. I personally prefer the latter even though it has the drawback of introducing larger diffs when working on text because you may have to re-wrap an entire paragraph.

bcoe commented 5 years ago

@ctavan this looks reasonable to me 👍

We might eventually want to be a little careful about gating ourselves on the success of standard modules, just because the proposal is a bit contentions right now ... but I think at the outset, it's reasonable to reference the proposal.